Strike Graph is a compliance automation startup that has built a genuinely transparent product. Their pricing is published, their AI capabilities are documented, and their framework coverage is specific. That transparency makes the comparison concrete.
The question for most CISOs isn't whether Strike Graph is honest about what it costs - it's whether the per-framework billing model works when you're running multiple compliance programs.
What Strike Graph Offers
Strike Graph's core is their Verify AI layer - an automation system that reviews evidence, links records, auto-fills fields, and handles routine questionnaire responses using 5,000+ data points pulled from your stack. Their Security Assistant provides compliance recommendations and can implement fixes from within the platform.
They support a wide range of frameworks: SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, DORA, NIS2, NIST 800-53, HITRUST, ISO 42001, CMMC, and others. The platform includes a library of 230+ audit-tested controls covering SOC 2 fully. They also include some security tools directly: annual penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, and SBOM support.
Reviews are mixed but generally positive. Common praise covers the audit workflow and the quality of the control library.
The Pricing Math
Strike Graph publishes their pricing, which is commendable. The Certify plan starts at $9,000/year and covers a single framework. The Scale plan starts at $18,000/year. Additional frameworks cost $2,000-$8,000 each.
For a company running two frameworks - say SOC 2 and ISO 27001 - the total lands somewhere between $11,000 and $27,000 per year, depending on plan and framework selection. Three frameworks adds another $2,000-$8,000 on top. That model works at one framework. It compounds as you scale.
GenIsec's modular pricing charges $199-$599 per module, not per framework. Adding a second or third compliance framework doesn't trigger a separate line-item charge. You pay for the functional modules you use - risk register, vendor assessments, access reviews, evidence management - not for each certification goal.
Autonomous Agents vs. AI Assistance
Strike Graph's Verify AI assists compliance teams. It automates evidence collection, fills forms, and handles questionnaire responses when a user triggers it. That's a meaningful productivity boost.
GenIsec runs 9 autonomous agents: evidence collection, gap analysis, gap prioritization, questionnaire response, audit reporting, board reporting, compliance advisory, remediation guidance, and risk assessment. These are separate production implementations running on a schedule, not features activated by user action.
The operational distinction: Strike Graph's AI makes your team faster. GenIsec's agents work the program while your team is focused elsewhere.
Framework Refresh
Strike Graph updates frameworks through their product release cycle. When NIS2 or DORA regulations change, customers receive updated controls in the next product update.
GenIsec auto-refreshes compliance frameworks monthly through a scheduled process that pulls directly from regulatory sources. No release cycle wait - the platform updates within one month of a regulatory change.
MSSP Coverage
Strike Graph has no documented MSSP multi-tenant capability. The platform is designed for organizations managing their own compliance programs.
GenIsec's MSSP layer is a separate infrastructure environment with 17+ portal modules, per-client AI management, custom domain white-labeling, and SLA tracking per client. Security service providers can run client GRC programs under their own brand.
How They Compare
| Capability | GenIsec | Strike Graph |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomous AI agents | 9 dedicated agents running on a schedule without user prompting | Verify AI assists compliance teams - AI-assisted features triggered by user action |
| Pricing model | Per module ($199-$599) - adding frameworks doesn't add cost | Per framework - $2,000-$8,000 per additional framework on top of base plan |
| Multi-framework cost at 3 frameworks | Same as single framework | $13,000-$35,000+ depending on plan and framework selection |
| MSSP white-label platform | Full dedicated infrastructure per MSSP | No documented MSSP multi-tenant offering |
| Hebrew + Israeli regulation | Native (Amendment 13, IL Privacy Law, ISA) | Not available |
| Auto-refreshing frameworks | Monthly cron from regulatory sources | Product release cycle |
| Board report generation | AI-generated via dedicated boardReportAgent | Not available |
| Risk register | Full heat map, likelihood x impact, treatment tracking | Not documented as core capability |
| Business Impact Analysis | Built-in with RTO/RPO tracking | Not available |
| Penetration test management | Built-in findings tracking | Annual pentest included in plan |
| Compliance frameworks | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA, Amendment 13, ISA, and more | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, DORA, NIS2, NIST, HITRUST, CMMC, and others |
| Pricing transparency | Published per-module rates | Published per-framework tiers |
Who Strike Graph Works For
Strike Graph is a reasonable choice for a company going through its first or second certification, particularly if SOC 2 is the primary target and the team values a clean interface with published pricing.
The math changes when you're managing three or more frameworks simultaneously, running programs for multiple clients, or need agents that work without daily team involvement. At that point, the per-framework billing model and feature-based AI approach create friction that wasn't there at one framework.
GenIsec's flat modular pricing and autonomous agent architecture are built for the multi-framework, multi-client operating reality. Both platforms are honest about what they cost - but they're priced for different operating scales.
Ready to Automate Your Compliance?
GenIsec.AI covers GRC, risk management, vendor oversight, and board reporting - all from one AI-powered platform.
Book a Free Demo